Watch: Dr. Robert Epstein, Joe Biden supporter, shows evidence “the system was rigged against one candidate”

Tucker Carlson came under scrutiny recently after he seemed to attack attorney Sidney Powell for ignoring his call for Ms. Powell to be on his show after Powell made rounds on other nighttime news show alleging she has enough information to overturn the election. Sidney Powell claims she has enough information that the voting systems that the counties in question used could be (and were) manipulated in favor of one candidate.

(Article by Marmee Rooke republished from TheFederalistPapers.org)

Tucker claimed that if she had the evidence, she could come on his show and prove it to the world. He said he would give her the full hour, but he insinuated that she could be a fraud since she denied his request.

Maybe in an attempt to save face, or maybe it was a way of making up for his mistake, regardless Tucker Carlson continues to fight to uncover proof of the Republican’s claim of a stolen 2020 election.

In 2019, Tucker Carlson had Dr. Robert Epstein, “one of the world’s foremost experts on the effects of big tech on politics,” on his show to explain how an internet search can change the results of an election.

Dr. Epstein, back in 2019 said, “Google and similar companies like Facebook are completely unregulated in the United States, so they can do whatever they please.” We have seen glimmers of how these companies act when they “are completely unregulated.” The bias is always in favor of one party, and that party isn’t ours.

TRENDING: Laura Ingraham Tells Viewers Joe Biden Will Be Inaugurated President, It’s Now Time To Live In ‘Reality’

Dr. Epstein continued saying, “If they all work together in 2020 to support the same presidential candidate, they can shift upwards of 15 million votes with no one knowing that they have been manipulated and without leaving a paper trail.”

Damn, if that doesn’t sound familiar.

pic.twitter.com/Za1BByChjN

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 24, 2020

Dr. Epstein, a Democrat who clarifies that he does not support President Trump, says that he assembled a team to monitor the effect that these large tech companies could have on the 2020 election.

Dr. Epstein claims he has gathered enough information so far to prove that these large tech companies were responsible for “shifting” 6 million votes and counting.

He says the proof includes a search engine algorithm that delivered unbalanced search results by giving conservatives a harsh liberal slant on search results. He says this coupled with the data showing for “a period of days, when the ‘vote’ reminder on Google’s homepage, was being sent only to liberals – not one of [his] conservative field agents received a vote reminder during those days.”

It wasn’t until after the fourth day of monitoring, and Dr. Epstein making his findings public did Google stop. He said it was the same night that they noticed the algorithm stopped completely.

He said Google wasn’t the only culprit, using manipulations to help their preferred candidate, and that his company was monitoring other companies like Youtube, Facebook, Bing, and Yahoo. With all of the data he has quantified, he believes this was enough to “shift” the election results.

Dr. Epstein says that these large tech companies don’t stop at American elections and use their influence for different political spectrums depending on the company’s need. For example, he claims that Google helped the Chinese government spy on its citizens.

Dr. Epstein says what he feared would happen did happen. He says that whistleblowers from Google, along with undercover video/audio and internal documents, have come out for over a year sounding the alarm that Google wanted President Trump out of the oval office. He claims these videos prove that Google employees would stop at nothing to ensure he didn’t win the Presidency.

Dr. Epstein claims that large tech companies buy academics’ silence off with large research grants.

As Tucker Carlson says, “The 2020 presidential election was not fair. No honest person would claim that it was fair. On many levels, the system was rigged against one candidate and in favor of another.”

Read more at: TheFederalistPapers.org